BREAKING NEWS & VIEWS
Newsweek Will 'Eventually' Go Digital-Only
Thursday, July 26, 2012
controlling interest in Newsweek Daily Beast Co. after the family of the late Sidney Harman announced that they were freezing their investment.
Audio-stereo magnate Sidney Harman had purchased Newsweek from The Washington Post Co. for a nominal $1 plus about $50 million in liabilities in August 2010, and three months later, he and Diller agreed to the merger of print (Newsweek) and Web (The Daily Beast). Harman had an emotional attachment to Newsweek and the financial wherewithal to absorb the losses (The Daily Beast is a money-loser, too), but his death in April 2011 at 92 years old took away the first part of the equation.
Newsweek's 2012 ad pages are +4.07% through July 23, but that is misleading because its advertising base had atrophied in 2009/2010/2011.Rival Time, though -20.47% through the same issue date, had carried nearly 213 more ad pages (604.45 versus 391.47).
Although no complete decision is expected before September, a possible scenario would be reducing the Newsweek print schedule to specials before fully going digital.That would match the strategy of the Mort Zuckerman-owned U.S. News & World Report in 2009, but the difference is that the digital side of Newsweek is The Daily Beast. (USN&WR is a standalone.)
Would Tina Brown, who is editor-in-chief of both, abandon The Daily Beast for the better-known Newsweek brand? Or will there be two separate sites with distinct identities? These are two of many questions that will be answered.
If you have breaking news to share please contact min’s editors.
|Copyright © 2013 Access Intelligence, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Access Intelligence, LLC is prohibited. For more details please see Terms and Conditions.|