Get Media Industry Alerts
Visit min's sister site:


Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn   Google+   
Latest Issue »
Subscribe Now »
Get 4
Free Issues »
BREAKING NEWS & VIEWS

Scientific American Enters the iPad Era


Thursday, July 19, 2012


In print since 1845, Scientific American is the longest-lived continuously published magazine title in the U.S. But the granddaddy of American magazines is but a pup on the iPad, where monthly digital issues finally arrived this week.

The inaugural issue doesn’t offer a flashy animated cover, but it does leverage the platform to offer a slide show of four variant covers. The magazine uses the Adobe publishing platform, and so it obeys its familiar navigation and indexing conventions. Following a recent trend in tablet magazine publishing, the TOC is a long scrolling wall of tiles and short descriptors that hot link to the stories. We especially like the featured online material that comes right after the TOC, including a feed of the latest site headlines, the recent run of great “60-Second” SciAm audio. The top and most recent content is viewable within the app itself with links to full listing on the site itself. We like this approach because it introduces a dynamic element into the monthly magazine app. It also doesn’t just link to the Web but actually pulls the content into the app experience.

SciAm tries to make decent use of multimedia assets to do what the brand does best, make science engaging. Some features have slide shows. Small bits of animation are used here and there to illustrate concepts such as an unusual response to HIV virus by a select few people. A 3D model of the Mars Rover does not fare so well, however. We found the model frustrating and unresponsive. And there is altogether too much reorientation of the display to accommodate some of the tablet-enhanced features. But generally the use of interactive effects is kept modest and leveraged when it is genuinely helpful. The overall user experience is still a bit rough around the edges, however.
The sections of the magazine are nicely divided by red full page nav pages. These pages work nicely in the drop down TOC to orient the reader within the long scroll of stories so they can make their way back to section marketers. There is the standard Favorites tagging. And like too many magazines there is not smart use of in-app content sharing.

One of our favorite uses of tablet enhancement comes in a retrospective feature that highlights great articles that past Nobel Prize winners have published in Scientific American. The review lets the user download full version PDFs of the many pieces going back decades. We also love the back of book look back at the magazine that pops up full screen versions of classic covers. For real brand loyalists, probably the sort who would be reading the magazine on their tablets, this is precisely the kind of enhanced experience they will like.

There are problems here. At time the touch opportunities feel gratuitous. Pop-up captions on many images really just fill space that otherwise is left blank anyway, so it isn’t clear what purpose is served by having us tap to see them. The commenting function is either broken on poorly executed. We can’t tell. Tap the hex icon that lets you comment on articles and you are dumped into the same SciAm Web home page. Huh? A comment function should be built into an app, and any links to the site show land on a specific relevant page.

We look forward to further refinements of the Scientific American tablet edition. This is a good if uneven start for a title that should have a lot to offer device users. The brand gets points for facing the big question of embedding dynamic content from the Web in a magazine edition. And the tablet enhancements are measured and purposeful more often than not.

Rating

If you have breaking news to share please contact min's editors.


Friend Us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/minOnline.

COMMENTS
1.
And doesn't support retina display for the new iPad! Text looks jagged
Posted by Jogo on Thursday, July 19, 2012 @ 10:02 PM
2.
I have the iPad Scientific American tablet app on my iPad 3.
I have a problem with the size and accessibility of the tablet editions.
They are too big. They range in size between 400 MB to 600 MB. A years worth will eat up my iPad memory quickly.
The PDF edition is usually about 30 MB but obviously doesn't have multimedia content and I archive those on my iMac.

I wouldn't mind the big size of the tablet editions if there were some way I could archive them outside of the restrictive iTunes/Apple closed-shop system. I could then view them on the iPad and when I've finished with them move them to the iMac and eventually to DVD backup.

Another way you might want to consider distributing these tablet editions is to use NASA's Visualisation Explorer app approach, which only downloads content that the user chooses to view within the app, not the whole of the content in one go as I think is the case with your tablet edition.

Meanwhile its good to see Sciam engaging with the tablet world
Posted by Barrie Collins on Tuesday, September 18, 2012 @ 09:30 PM
Up and Coming

Winners Announced
Editorial & Design Awards


Social Media Boot Camp
Dec. 4 | Yale Club, NYC
Register

Call for Entries! 
Best of the Web & Digital Awards
Entry Deadline: Dec. 5
Enter

Most Intriguing Awards Celebration
Dec. 5 | Grand Hyatt, NYC
Register

Search Jobs
Media Jobs

White Papers
Get even smarter.  Need a quick primer on a media topic? Download a white paper!

Optimizing Your Printer Services - By MRI

Media Insights: minsider Viewpoints from the Front Lines - By min


View Whitepapers
min Contests

min contests
Want to sponsor a min contest?

Inside min This Week
Events Calendar


All Events




min
Free Eletters — Sign up Now