Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  

Visit min's sister site:



The Minsiders

Alex Baxter

Frank Cutitta

Paul DeBraccio

Judy Franks

Dave Hendricks

Marko Hurst

Jay Lauf

Daniel Lagani

Karen Macumber

Diane Salvatore

Ken Sonenclar

Domenic Venuto

Marta Wohrle

Matthew Yorke

JUDY FRANKS

The Quickest Way to Ruin a Great Look.... Over-Accessorize

Use the Macy’s accessory wall, thoughtfully.”….Tim Gunn



Spoken like a true sage, Tim Gunn instructed the designers of Project Runway to carefully consider the resources available to them as they embellish their creations. I believe there’s a powerful marketing lesson in Tim’s words. Open access to resources cannot turn into a “free for all.” We must carefully edit our choices: to ensure that the experiences we put out are truly “thoughtful.”

The Macy’s accessory wall is a great metaphor for the vast array of potential brand touch-points that can enhance/complement/accessorize an integrated marketing plan. Unfortunately, many marketers are taking a "market basket" approach: use it all! This is exacerbated by the low price of entry into emerging social media touch-points. It doesn't cost much to start a Twitter feed, launch a fan page, create a widget/app, etc. So, why not? Let's throw it out there, embellish the plan with all the "accessories," and make a big, splash!

Nothing like too much of a good thing to totally spoil a great outfit!

I can’t think of a single brand that belongs “everywhere.” Yet, many confuse integrated marketing with 360 degree bombardment. The discipline of integrated channel planning involves the “thoughtful” selection of those touch-points that can create contextual relevance: a brand experience that is both important and meaningful. Not all brand experiences can hold such power. And, it’s dangerous to assume that consumers will simply edit out those experiences that do not hold relevance. It's much like over-accessorizing a great outfit.

“I was going for a certain look.”

Another valuable lesson from the Macy’s accessory wall: The accessories are not selected in a vacuum. Rather, they are considered for their contributions to an integrated fashion statement on the runway. The designers have to create a certain “look” that is a whole experience. And, they are ultimately responsible for crafting the “look” through model selection, hair, makeup, accessories, etc. Sure, they consult with specialists/experts in the process. But one designer ultimately holds the whole vision and makes the call.

Who is the “designer” in our fragmented marketing services industry?

Marketers, too, must create a vision for the total brand experience. We desperately need a designer’s sketch pad, an integrated marketing plan as our compass for the whole “look.” Fragmentation by functional specialty, “hand-offs” to departments and agency specialists and decisions made in isolation are a recipe for a disjointed “look” that marketers will send down the runway.

You think the Project Runway judges are brutal? Consumers are even less forgiving.

There is limited “immunity” in the real world. Consumers are less forgiving when they are bombarded with experiences and choices. There is more opportunity to “stick out like a sore thumb” and ruin the “look” than ever before. As consumers increasingly multi-task and create layered, nuanced media experiences, an integrated perspective will become even more critical.

Now, more than ever, when the choices are abundant we must carefully edit brand experiences to craft a whole “look.” Like the man says, use the Macy’s accessory wall thoughtfully.

Minsider Judy Franks is the founder and president of The Marketing Democracy, a consultancy that helps world-class marketers bridge the creative and media divide that exists in today’s unbundled marketing services industry.

COMMENTS