Eye On Advertising: George Janson: Print is Not and 'Endangered Species'

As managing partner and director of print for mediaedge:cia, George Janson is a keen magazine champion. In his role at MEC, he oversees magazine planning, buying for an eclectic clientele that includes Macy's, Xerox, EJ Gallo, Chanel, Chevron, and Citibank. He has also lent his expertise to accounts that run the gamut from Eastman Kodak and Holiday Inn to International Home Foods and Whitehall Robbins. Janson's accomplishments in print landed him a spot as one of min magazine's "top magazine players" in 2000. Five years later, we named him one of the industry's "21 most intriguing." Recently, I caught up with Janson to find out his thoughts on the current state of affairs.

Iris Dorbian: With all the 21st-century focus on digital, is print an endangered species?

George Janson: No, I think that's a very naive view of the world. The same people who are saying that are probably saying that the dollar bill is dead. I really believe that content is king. That's what magazines are all about. The big challenge for publishers is monetizing the content and also striking alliances with like-minded partners that make sense to leverage their content. We're starting to see more of that.

Dorbian: What have been the most positive--and disturbing--trends that you've seen in magazine advertising lately?

Janson: I think the most positive trend is that magazines--not only publishers, but also editors--are starting to think of themselves as brand managers and really leveraging their brand in very interesting ways. What happened initially is that we saw a lot of extensions that really didn't follow the money and they were investing in media and programs that the consumer wasn't interested in. I believe magazines are doing a better job of investing in research with their audiences as well and building extensions that really meet their needs.

Dorbian: What's your view on how magazines are packaging their brands? In your opinion, what are examples of creative programs and where have they gone wrong?

Janson: One of the best programs is the The New Yorker Festival [each September]. It's the gold standard. [Publishers go wrong] when they're not following the consumer and try to be all things to all people and try to capture the flavor of the day. [An example is] a traditional women's service magazine sponsoring a program that is more fitting for Cosmopolitan or Glamour.

Dorbian: What's your take on advertising spent in social media? Is this the next new wave?

Janson: I don't know if the scale is there right now. But I believe there's a place for it particularly in such vertical categories as weddings and, perhaps, parenting. In those areas [that deal with] life-changing moments, you want all the information that's out there. The question is: "What role do these extensions play for the brand? Are they offering real value to the consumer and the advertiser as well?"

Dorbian: What advice would you give to a publisher looking to get a bigger piece of the pie?

Janson: Demonstrating accountability is very key. But look at other metrics that measure engagement. We have to ask:

1. Did someone take action? And,

2. Did perception of the brand change?

It's also [about] understanding your target audiences as well.

Iris Dorbian is group editor of min/min's b2b and PR News, for which she writes the weekly case study.


min's State of the Digital Media

View Details


All min Books

min's Sweet 16 Issue

Media Jobs
Communications Specialist, National Network to End Domestic Violence
Communications Director, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Inside min This Week